InfoExpress Network Security Solutions
Security Solutions and Vulnerability Management SolutionsNetwork Security ProductsInfoExpress NewsInfoExpress SupportAbout InfoExpressNetwork Security PartnersContact InfoExpressDownload Information Security Demos
 


The Official Unofficial Blog

By the InfoExpress Insider

Sept 9, 2011 - Yep, A Better Year

Looks like everything last year could have been has become. That's hard to do in the best of times, but downright challenging these days. But amazingly, NAC growth rates as a percentage increased again and the company is looking to improve upon last year.

Trends we're seeing for NAC include mobile computing (of course, it's the iPads, iPhones, iEverything), virtualization, even a little bit of clouds for good measure. They're all pointing in the same direction which means there are some challenges and opportunities ahead.

So far, so good.

Oct 15, 2010 - Large NAC Deployments Heating Up a Cold Economy

We're seeing the NAC market picking up lately, with a bias towards very large deployments with 50k to 100k+ endpoint. I've been pondering why this is the case in a bad economy, and think it's related to productivity.

Organizations need to maximize their efficiency without raising recurrding costs, and the only way to do that is through improved productivity. This can come in the form of automation, or through lower help desk and maintenance costs. NAC comes into play because it discovers systems that are out of compliance, and helps keep compliant systems healthy. All of this transfers to the bottom line, which is the easiest way to improve profits.

This isn't just the case with NAC, but any technology that improves productivity or increases sales without increasing head count is a win.

March 22, 2010 - Longest Hiatus Ever

It's been nearly three years since the last blog, and the world has seen quite the shakeup. Financial markets almost collapsed, housing prices cratered worldwide, China has become the world's largest market for automobiles, and universal health care is on the verge of reality.

In the same period, most NAC companies have distanced themselves from the word NAC, Consentry has folded, and analysts are now saying they're not sure if there really is a NAC market. My response is to poo poo all that. Things move in the hype-fall-reality cycle for every technology. The Great Recession may have accelerated the demise of some NAC companies like Consentry, but it's coming back in a much humbled state.

Sure, the big guys like Cisco, Microsoft, and Juniper have NAC solutions, but it's a broad enough technology that there's plenty of differentiators. I'm not going into the techie stuff here, but ability to deploy broadly and easily remains one of the biggest challenges, and biggest differentiators between offerings.

I'll be the first to eat crow if I'm wrong, but I predict NAC will be here to stay and will thrive in the upcoming years. It will not roar with hype, but tread in organizations with the quiet assurance of a technology that provides real benefits to real people.

July 11, 2007 - Consolidation and Convergence

It's been awhile since the last blog - more than a little, so I'm going to recap some of my thoughts on interesting tidbits since, NAC or not. Mostly the theme seems to be consolidation.

Network Computing gets folded into InformationWeek by its parent, CMP Media (June). In the good old nostalgic days, a single postive NWC review could propel a company from obscurity into limelight. NWC certainly helped us out with their reviews of the CyberArmor personal firewall and network access control. Ironically, the Internet which NWC wrote so much about ultimately was its demise by moving advertising online. Will be missed.

SonicWall completed the acquisition today of Aventail for $25M, a fraction of the $115M raised by Aventail over its decade of operation. Aventail competed against the InfoExpress VPN product when it started, but our product lines diverged. There was some potential competition when Aventail pitched itself as a NAC solution, but that was mostly positioning - how can a SSL VPN be a NAC product? If Aventail had known how many vendors were going to jump into the NAC space, maybe they would have found another niche.

I just came back from a vacation in Laguna Beach, and Internet access was free at hotels and cafes, even the classy ones where I usually don't hang out. The phone calls were still expensive, but who needs them with cell phones? Access will be even less as Wi Fi is built into cell phones. Prediction: phone calls will be cheaper, quality will be worse, and of course there will be concern about protecting the network from mobile devices. All obvious, but I didn't promise to be a revolutionary.

April 28, 2007 - Cool - Dynamic NAC wins in the CRN Tech Bakeoff

A little known fact was that InfoExpress was the first company with remote access VPN NAC in 1999, the first with in-line NAC in early 2002, and the first to use VLAN based NAC quarantine in 2004. What's more is the products preceded others by about a year, a huge lead for technology markets.

My point? The company has had time to learn what it takes to deploy NAC. Our conclusion years ago was NAC needed to be easier and more scalable. Not just incrementally easier, but vastly easier than current products. Having deployed our VPN and personal firewall software in huge enterprises, the company knew what a scalable solution needed to be. Although some organizations might have resources and funds for extra hardware or network reconfiguration, a large part of the market was passed over with approaches that were too difficult.

From that conclusion and after many nights of brainstorming, the concept for Dynamic NAC arose. Although Dynamic NAC is referred to as a peer based solution, it's really a peer-less NAC because the enforcer is a peer but doesn't require a peer to enforce. Enforcers can block access to the network from rogue devices.

Dynamic NAC has been a long time coming, and it's great to see that some of our conclusions being validated. I've recently seen articles based on Forrester Research and Yankee Group that indicate that ease of deployment is a major issue and stumbling block for NAC, but more about that in the next blog.

April 19, 2007 - Vista status for InfoExpress products

The Vista versions are moving along for all product lines, with releases scheduled for mid-2007. Most the beta testing and fixes should be wrapped up this month or early next, giving about two months for testing release candidates. We haven't encountered unexpected surprises with ports for Vista, including CyberArmor, Dynamic NAC, or VSClient - welcome news indeed.

Most of the work is going into the installers. With Microsoft tightening up their operating system, the work to develop transparent upgrades to Vista is a paint in the b___. Other than that, Vista ports looks smooth so far for VPN, network access control, and the personal firewall. Whatever people may think about the Red giant, their efforts to keep the OS backwards compatible is decent. I've seen worse compatibility issues with Linux and MacOS in earlier days.

On the other hand, if Microsoft hadn't added everything but the kitchen sink into their web browser, we probably wouldn't need patches as frequently.

March 28, 2007 - Looking at the past to predict the future of Network Access Control
To see where we'll be going in the future, I like to refer to the past for parallels. Seeing history repeating itself is as close to a crystal ball I can find. In this case, NAC's similarity to the VPN space is close.

VPN products had just kicked off about 10 years ago, and proprietary solutions abounded at all layers of the stack. Customers wanted to standardize the protocol, so IPSec came along a few years later. Now, lots of vendors could use IPSec even though the nifty features in proprietary implementations were what sold products. Companies could use a VPN client from vendor X to interoperate with a VPN concentrator from vendor Y, but the loss of key proprietary features made that unsatisfactory. A few years later, SSL VPNs came along to fill the gap. What's interesting is that with SSL VPNs, we're back to proprietary implementations again.

In the NAC space, we have a fuzzy problem too. Compliance checking, quarantining, and remediation. My guess is we'll end up in the same place as VPNs, with a a call by many companies to use standards like 802.1x or large vendor frameworks. But amidst the hype, companies are likely to find out that it's a lot of work and money to upgrade their network to support NAC. When that happens, they'll want a combination of standards based approaches and proprietary ones that can ease the transition.

March 16, 2007 - The Voyage Begins
Sometime not too long ago, the marketing gurus said the company needed a blog on endpoint security and network access control. Since I knew something about the topic, the task fell (and fell and fell) until it reached my mailbox. I suppose this makes me the official blogger, but I'll try to keep it real. So with the maiden voyage beginning, I'll write more soon. Next topic: why the NAC space feels just like the VPN space about 10 years ago.

InfoExpress. Copyright © 2007. All Rights Reserved.